The use of AI agents in software engineering is an area of research that offers remarkable possibilities to improve software development processes and security?management in LMS. In this?paper, we investigate the use of AI agents in LMS development, concerning the AI ability to automate software engineering tasks, enhance system performance and guarantee secure security measures. AI-based resources such as machine learning algorithms, natural language processing, and prescriptive analytics?can improve much of the software lifecycle management process from requirements gathering to deployment with automating some of the most difficult hurdles such as determining system updates in real time, and understanding what failures can happen. In addition, AI agents can greatly improve?security management through their ability to recognize vulnerabilities, automate threat scanning, and proactively guard against potential threats. The paper provides an overview of AI applications in software engineering?and a framework to use AI agents in LMS environments as means to cut down manual work, speed up development, and increase system security. The paper concludes by suggesting future research directions in AI-enhanced software engineering, emphasizing on how AI\'s evolving role can?help to meet growing cybersecurity challenges in educational technologies.
Introduction
The study explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents into software engineering and security management for Learning Management Systems (LMS). AI agents are employed to automate software development tasks—including code generation, bug detection, and optimization—using machine learning and NLP, which reduces repetitive work, shortens development cycles, and improves code quality.
For security management, AI agents monitor system activity, detect anomalies, and respond to threats in real time using methods like anomaly detection, Gaussian Mixture Models, and deep learning, providing robust protection against cyberattacks and safeguarding sensitive educational data.
Additionally, AI enhances adaptive learning in LMS through reinforcement learning, dynamically adjusting course content and feedback to improve student engagement and performance.
The proposed hybrid architecture consists of:
Software Development Agent (SDA) – automates code-related tasks.
Security Management Agent (SMA) – monitors, detects, and responds to threats.
Data Pipeline – collects and processes real-time and historical data for AI training.
Learning Layer – applies reinforcement learning for adaptive education.
Evaluation shows that integrating AI agents in LMS leads to reduced bugs, faster development, improved security threat detection, and enhanced student outcomes, demonstrating AI’s potential to optimize software development, security, and personalized learning simultaneously.
Conclusion
In this paper, we have examined the incorporation of AI agents in the software development life cycle and as well as of security management in Learning Management?Systems (LMS). \"This has proved to us just how powerful AI can be in the optimization of software development, or in enhancing security?measures, and of course in improving student learning outcomes. Through use of machine learning algorithms, natural language processing and deep learning, AI agents were able to significantly, reducing bugs helping speed up development?cycles, identifying anomalies and improving identification of threats. In addition, I think the reinforcement learning-powered adaptive learning system made an impressive improvement of student\'s performance, thus advocating a more?personal and delightful learning journey.
References
[1] Gurcan, F.; Dalveren, G.G.M.; Cagiltay, N.E.; Soylu, A. Detecting latent topics and trends in software engineering research since 1980 using probabilistic topic modeling. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 74638–74654.
[2] Inkollu, K.; Gorle, S.K.; Kondabattula, S.R.; Shankar, P.B.; Reddy, M.B. A Review on Software Engineering: Perspective of Emerging Technologies & Challenges. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Research in Intelligent Computing in Engineering, Hyderabad, India, 1–2 December 2023; pp. 23–27.
[3] Kuhrmann, M.; Tell, P.; Hebig, R.; Klünder, J.; Münch, J.; Linssen, O.; Pfahl, D.; Felderer, M.; Prause, C.R.; MacDonell, S.G.; et al. What makes agile software development agile? IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 2021, 48, 3523–3539.
[4] Forsgren, N. DevOps delivers. Commun. ACM 2018, 61, 32–33.
[5] Gall, M.; Pigni, F. Taking DevOps mainstream: A critical review and conceptual framework. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2022, 31, 548–567.
[6] Sauvola, J.; Tarkoma, S.; Klemettinen, M.; Riekki, J.; Doermann, D. Future of software development with generative AI. Autom. Softw. Eng. 2024, 31, 26.
[7] Kim, S.; Park, T. Understanding Innovation Resistance on the Use of a New Learning Management System (LMS). Sustainability 2023, 15, 12627.
[8] Wang, W.; Kofler, L.; Lindgren, C.; Lobel, M.; Murphy, A.; Tong, Q.; Pickering, K. AI for Psychometrics: Validating Machine Learning Models in Measuring Emotional Intelligence with Eye-Tracking Techniques. J. Intell. 2023, 11, 170.
[9] Turing, A.M. Computing machinery and intelligence 1950. In The Essential Turing: The Ideas That Gave Birth to the Computer Age; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1950; pp. 433–464.
[10] Roumeliotis, K.I.; Tselikas, N.D. ChatGPT and Open-AI Models: A Preliminary Review. Future Internet 2023, 15, 192.
[11] Liu, S.; Castillo-Olea, C.; Berkovsky, S. Emerging Applications and Translational Challenges for AI in Healthcare. Information 2024, 15, 90.
[12] Reina, G. Robotics and AI for Precision Agriculture. Robotics 2024, 13, 64.
[13] Paduano, I.; Mileto, A.; Lofrano, E. A Perspective on AI-Based Image Analysis and Utilization Technologies in Building Engineering: Recent Developments and New Directions. Buildings 2023, 13, 1198.
[14] Ogundiran, J.; Asadi, E.; Gameiro da Silva, M. A Systematic Review on the Use of AI for Energy Efficiency and Indoor Environmental Quality in Buildings. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3627.
[15] Sharif, M.; Munz, F.; Uckelmann, D. KNIGHT Learning Analytics Architecture for Betterment of Student Education. In Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies; Springer: Cham, Swizterland, 2023; Volume 190, pp. 42–52.
[16] Berry, J.E. The Internet: An Educational System for Equalizing Educational Opportunity. In Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education; Springer: Cham, Swizterland, 2020; pp. 1587–1607.
[17] Tendulkar, A.; Vaz, A.; Palaniappan, S. AI-based digital model in teaching and learning, support development of critical thinking, and problem solving for smart universities. In Advancements in Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain Technology, and IoT in Higher Education: Mitigating the Impact of COVID-19; Apple Academic Press: Palm Bay, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 27–51.
[18] Zagorskis, V.; Gorbunovs, A.; Kapenieks, A. TELECI Architecture for Machine Learning Algorithms Integration in an Existing LMS. Available online: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tZfYDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA121&dq=TELECI+Architecture+for+Machine+Learning+Algorithms+Integration+in+an+Existing+LMS&ots=j3OgR9d4wM&sig=vemzQtCfPfMD_7r2UDOrUzR9IUc (accessed on 30 April 2024).
[19] Alam, A. Developing a Curriculum for Ethical and Responsible AI: A University Course on Safety, Fairness, Privacy, and Ethics to Prepare Next Generation of AI Professionals. In Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies; Springer: Cham, Swizterland, 2023; Volume 171, pp. 879–894.
[20] Bennett, E.E.; McWhorter, R.R. Dancing in the Paradox: Virtual Human Resource Development, Online Teaching, and Learning. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 2022, 24, 99–116.